Mrs. Clinton support Science

The New York Times published an article on October 3, 2007, written by Patrick Healy and Cornelia Dean, regarding Mrs. Clinton’s commitment to combat global warning. Hillary Rodham Clinton critiqued the Bush administration science policy. She said that if she were elected president the next elections, she would enforce the science research to combat the global warning and find energy alternatives to foreign oil. Also, she pointed out the need for a strong program of human exploration of space.

Mrs. Clinton’s proposals for the new administration seem to be more realistic and necessary than Bush administration. She beliefs that traveling to the Moon or Mars just excites people. For that reason she will focus on nearer-term achievable goals. Her remarks were to attack President Bush for his “war on science” that has allowed political appointees to shape and in some cases distort science-based federal reports.

This article is worth to read because the author displays very important arguments Mrs. Clinton said. The vote is secret, but I confess my secret I will vote for her. I believe she is more realistic. She always has a counterargument for her contenders. For instance, she criticized Republican presidential candidates that said that they do not believe in evolution, while other Republican contenders have said they support teaching evolution and creationist ideas.

Our future president, Mrs. Clinton, sought to lay our her agenda in what one adviser called “a contest of ideas” with her Democratic rivals, who have been increasingly delivering more policy speeches in hopes of winning voters with big ideas that counter nearly seven years of Bush administration policy. She said in a interview. “When science is politicized, it is worse than wrong. It is dangerous for our democracy.”